| Paper: | 1 | 2 | 3 | Advanced Search |
From this hadith, scholars have derived several key rulings:
The citation of "Umdah al-Ahkam Vol. 3, Hadith No. 460" for a controversial claim is widely regarded as a fabricated, non-existent entry in the authentic collection of legal rulings by Imam Abdul Ghani al-Maqdisi. The claim is often used in polemic contexts to misrepresent Islamic text, with actual databases showing that authentic hadith collections contain entirely different subjects under similar numbers. For a breakdown of this fabricated citation, visit
Intentionally withholding a partner's rights without a valid reason is classified as a major misstep ( Kabeerah ), as evidenced by the invocation of the angels' curse. Umdah Al-ahkam Vol. 3 Hadith No. 460
| Transaction Type | Ruling per Hadith No. 460 | |----------------|---------------------------| | Rent land for fixed amount of silver/gold (cash) | Permissible (Ijarah) | | Sharecropping with known percentage (e.g., 50%) | Permissible – proven by Khaybar | | Rent land for fixed quantity of produce (e.g., 5 tons of wheat) | Prohibited (due to Gharar) |
) to encourage the Muslims and during the Farewell Pilgrimage to remind them not to be prideful of their numbers. 3. Understanding Umdah al-Ahkam Umdat al-Ahkam From this hadith, scholars have derived several key
In Sahih-specific numbering often used to supplement 'Umdah commentaries, Hadith 460 can refer to the rights of a husband or the importance of marital harmony, as seen in Sahih Bukhari summaries . 3. Fact-Check: Misinformation Alert
The Prophet (ﷺ) reportedly said this during the digging of the Trench ( Ghazwah al-Khandaq The claim is often used in polemic contexts
"And upon you be peace," Yazid replied with a smile that didn't quite reach his eyes. "For a devoted husband, I have the finest wool. It is usually ten dirhams a yard, but for you... eight."
, the numbering does not even reach 460, as the book is a concise selection of roughly 400-500 hadiths depending on the edition's layout. Context of the "Satanic Verses" Narrative
Yazid moved with practiced efficiency. He pulled the fabric, his hands a blur. As he placed the heavy brass weights on the scale to measure the cut, his thumb lingered just a moment too long on the plate. The scale tipped. To the traveler, it looked like four yards. In reality, it was three and a half.
In Vol. 3 of Umdah al-Ahkam , this hadith appears within the Kitab al-Aqdiyah (Book of Judgments). It is often cited by classical scholars like Ibn Qudamah and al-Nawawi to resolve disputes over debt, property, or injury. A typical scenario: ‘A’ claims ‘B’ owes him 1,000 dirhams. ‘B’ denies it. ‘A’ has no witnesses or document. The judge rules: (a) ‘A’ fails due to lack of proof; (b) ‘B’ is asked to swear an oath; (c) If ‘B’ swears, the case is dismissed. If ‘B’ refuses the oath, some schools (e.g., Hanbali and Shafi’i) rule that the claim is transferred back to ‘A’ who can then swear and win the case.
